2026 № 1 (56)

A Man from the Outside: The Innovative Hero Type in the Industrial Films of the 1970s

UDC 791.43.03

LBC 85.373(2); 85.374.3(2)

DOI: 10.51678/2226-0072-2026-1-426-455


For cit.: Kotik N.V. A Man from the Outside: The Innovative Hero Type in the Industrial Films of the 1970s. Hudozhestvennaya kul’tura [Art & Culture Studies], 2026, no. 1, pp. 426–455. https://doi.org/10.51678/2226-0072-2026-1-426-455. (In Russian)


Kotik Nikita V. 

PhD Student, Department of History and Philosophy,
S.A. Gerasimov All-Russian State University of Cinematography (VGIK), 3 Wilhelm Pieck Str., Moscow, 129226, Russia; Researcher, The State Central Museum of Cinema, 119 bld. 36 Mira Av., Moscow, 129223, Russia 

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4987-1362 

buffalo1812@gmail.com 


A Man from the Outside: The Innovative Hero Type in the Industrial Films of the 1970s

Abstract. The article analyses the figure of the innovative hero in the Soviet industrial cinema of the 1970s. The research focuses on engineers, managers, and technical specialists who often appear in the narrative as ‘outsiders’ — characters sent to a factory or construction site to modernize production processes, optimize work organization, and inspire workers to embrace change. This narrative device, as well as the broader reinterpretation of the industrial theme, reflects both the ruling Party’s strategic emphasis on the scientific and technological revolution and the tightening of cultural policy aimed at reaffirming the principles of the socialist realist canon. Using prominent examples such as Our Home Is Here (1973), The Old Walls (1973), and Feedback (1977), the article demonstrates that the ‘outsider’ figure does not restore the socialist realist model but instead exposes its inner contradictions and new ideological fractures. Comparison with Stalin-era films reveals significant shifts: the innovative hero loses connection with the collective, personal and professional goals diverge, and film endings lack the triumphantly optimistic resolution typical of classic socialist realism. The presence of the innovator also unsettles the collective’s everyday life, highlighting a dissonance between mobilization demands and private interests. The study draws on contemporary reviews, critics’ commentaries, and archival materials from artistic councils and editorial boards, illustrating how sociocultural and ideological changes shaped the transformation of the movement in the late Soviet period. 

Keywords: Soviet cinema, production drama, socialist realism, cultural policy, late Soviet culture, Brezhnev era 


Sources:

Delo fil’ma “Zdes’ nash dom” (1 i 2 serii) (“Inzhener Cheshkov”), (“Chelovek so storony”), (“Budushchee rozhdaetsya v tsekhu”), (“Sovremennaya khronika”), (“Neudobnyi chelovek”). Avtor stsenariya I.M. Dvoretskii. Rezhisser-postanovshchik V.F. Sokolov: 1973 [The Case of the Film Our Home Is Here (Episodes 1 and 2) (“Engineer Cheshkov”), (“The Man from the Outside”), (“The Future Is Born in the Workshop”), (“Modern Chronicle”), (“Inconvenient Man”. The Script Was Written by I.M. Dvoretsky. Directed by V.F. Sokolov: 1973]. RGALI [Russian State Archive of Literature and Art], f. 2944, inv. 4, storage unit 2333, ll. 1–48. (In Russian)

Delo fil’ma “Obratnaya svyaz’”. Avtor stsenariya A.I. Gelman. Rezhisser-postanovshchik V. Tregubovich: 1976 [The Case of the Film Feedback. The Script Was Written by A.I. Gelman. Directed by V. Tregubovich: 1976]. RGALI [Russian State Archive of Literature and Art], f. 2944, inv. 4, storage unit 3872, ll. 1–58. (In Russian)

Otzyvy pressy o spektakle “Chelovek so storony” [Press Reviews of the Play The Man from the Outside]. RGALI [Russian State Archive of Literature and Art], f. 2908, inv. 3, storage unit 111, ll. 1–87. (In Russian)

Shauro V.F. Zapiska “O sovremennom sostoyanii sovetskoi kinematografii”: 1968 [Note “On the Current State of Soviet Cinematography”: 1968]. RGANI [Russian State Archive of Contemporary History], f. 5, inv. 60, storage unit 60, ll. 11–12. (In Russian)


References:

Belodubrovskaya M. Ne po planu: Kinematografiya pri Staline [Not According to Plan: Filmmaking under Stalin], transl. from English L. Mezenova. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2020. 264 p. (In Russian)

Brik O.M. O zanimatel’nosti [About Entertainment]. Kino, 1933, no. 27, pp. 2–3. (In Russian)

Vstrechnyi. Kak sozdavalsya fil’m: Sbornik statei [Counter. How the Film Was Created: Collection of Articles], ed. Sh. Akhushkov. Moscow, Kinofotoizdat Publ., 1935. 147 p. (In Russian)

Ivanova V. Razgovor ne po dusham [Not from the Heart Conversation]. Sovetskii ehkran, 1975, no. 4, pp. 3–5. (In Russian)

Kaspe I.M. “Ya est’!”: pozdnesovetskoe kino cherez prizmu relyatsionnoi sotsiologii Harrisona Waita (et vice versa) [“I Am!”: Late Soviet Cinema through the Prism of Harrison White’s Relational Sociology (et vice versa)]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2017, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 174–206. (In Russian)

Kaspe I.M. V soyuze s utopiei: Smyslovye rubezhi pozdnesovetskoi kul’tury [In Alliance with Utopia: Semantic Frontiers of Late Soviet Culture]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2018. 432 p. (In Russian)

Katinov V. Ukrainfil’m [Ukrainfilm]. Kino, 1934, no. 32, pp. 2–3. (In Russian)

Kolganov A.I. Tri modernizatsii v Rossii i nashe vremya [Three Modernizations in Russia and Our Time]. Politicheskii klass, 2005, no. 11. Available at: http://www.zlev.ru/69_64.htm (accessed 08.06.2025). (In Russian)

Kotik N.V. Sotsiokul’turnaya priroda kanona: opyt iskusstva i kinematografa stalinskoi ehpokhi [The Socio-Cultural Nature of the Canon: The Art and Cinema of the Stalinist Era]. Vestnik VGIK, 2023, vol. 15, no. 2 (56), pp. 22–35. (In Russian)

KPSS. S’ezd (24; 1971; Moskva): Stenograficheskii otchet: V 2 t. [CPSU. Congress (24; 1971; Moscow): Stenographic Report: In 2 vols.]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1971. 592 p. (In Russian)

Kremlevskii kinoteatr: 1928–1953: Dokumenty [The Kremlin Cinema: 1928–1953: Documents], Ruhr University (Bochum, Germany), Yu.M. Lotman In-t of Russian and Soviet Culture, Federal Arch. Agency, Russian State Archive of Social and Political History, comp. K.M. Anderson, L.V. Maksimenkov. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2005. 1120 p. (In Russian)

Kulagin O.I. Problemy trudovoi motivatsii rabotnikov lesnoi promyshlennosti Karelii v kontse 1960-kh — 1970-kh gg. [Problems of Labor Motivation of Forest Industry Workers in Karelia in the Late 1960s — 1970s]. Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk, 2012, no. 1, pp. 163–172. (In Russian)

Malyshev V.S. Geroi, sotsium i istoriya v otechestvennom kinematografe 1960–1970-kh godov [Hero, Society and History in Russian Cinema of the 1960s and 1970s]. Vestnik VGIK, 2022, vol. 14, no. 3 (53), pp. 8–17. (In Russian)

Meister G.I. “Vtoroi debyut, kotorogo tozhe ne bylo”: tsenzurnaya istoriya fil’ma “Prinimayu boi” S.G. Mikaelyana [“The Second Debut that Also Never Happened”: The Censorship History of the Film I Accept the Challenge by S.G. Mikaelyan]. Teatr. Zhivopis’. Kino. Muzyka, 2025, no. 2, pp. 135–161. https://doi.org/10.35852/2588-0144-2025-2-135-161. (In Russian)

Nogina E.V., Ushmaeva K.A. Mekhanizmy khishcheniya gosudarstvennoi sobstvennosti v usloviyakh planovoi ehkonomiki 1930-kh godov [Mechanisms of Theft of State Property in the Conditions of the Planned Economy of the 1930s]. Prepodavatel’ XXI vek, 2020, no. 4-2, pp. 322–334. https://doi.org/10.31862/2073-9613-2020-4-322-334. (In Russian)

Sovetskaya kinematografiya vypolnila plan 1939 goda [Soviet Cinematography Fulfilled the Plan of 1939]. Kino, 1940, no. 1, p. 1. (In Russian)

Sokhan I.V., Goncharov D.V. Sotsiokul’turnaya inzheneriya totalitarizma: sovetskii gastronomicheskii proehkt [Sociocultural Engineering of Totalitarianism: Soviet Gastronomic Project]. Politiya, 2013, no. 2 (69), pp. 142–155. (In Russian)

Sutyrin V.V. Problemy planirovaniya [Problems of Planning]. Proletarskoe kino, 1931, no. 8, pp. 4–16. (In Russian)

Tematicheskii plan [Thematic Plan]. Pravda, 1939, no. 92, p. 3. (In Russian)

Tovstonogov G.A. Neobychnoe zasedanie partkoma [An Unusual Meeting of the Party Committee]. Gelman A.I. Premiya: Kinostsenarii [The Award: Screenplay]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1976, pp. 3–11. (In Russian)

Shcherbenok A.V. Implitsitnyi zritel’ stalinskogo kino kak sub’ekt ideologii [The Implicit Viewer of Stalinist Cinema as a Subject of Ideology]. Chelovek i lichnost’ v istorii Rossii, konets XIX — XX vek: Materialy mezhdunarodnogo kollokviuma (Sankt-Peterburg, 7–10 iyunya 2010 goda) [Man and Personality in the History of Russia, the End of the 19th — 20th Century: Proceedings of the International Colloquium] (St. Petersburg, June 7–10, 2010), ed. board T.A. Abrosimova et al. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2012, pp. 426–436. (In Russian)



Received 03.07.2025

Revised 24.12.2025 

Accepted 12.01.2026 


Скачать в pdf