2026 № 1 (56)

The Visual Gavagai

UDC 14; 7.01

LBC 71; 87.8

DOI: 10.51678/2226-0072-2026-1-84-105


For cit.: Markov A.V., Shtayn O.A. The Visual Gavagai. Hudozhestvennaya kul’tura [Art & Culture Studies], 2026, no. 1, pp. 84–105. https://doi.org/10.51678/2226-0072-2026-1-84-105. (In Russian)


Markov Alexander V. 

D.Sc. (in Philology), Professor, Cinema and Contemporary Art Department, Faculty of Art History, Russian State University for the Humanities, 6 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047, Russia 

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-1073 

ResearcherID: Q-7934-2016 

Scopus Author ID: 57215218399 markovius@gmail.com 


Shtayn Oksana A. 

PhD (in Philosophy), Associate Professor, Department of Social Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, The First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin Ural Federal University, 19 Mira Str., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia 

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1701-3147 

ResearcherID: KQV-1280-2024 

Scopus Author ID: 59277695700 shtaynshtayn@gmail.com 


The Visual Gavagai

Abstract. This article develops and introduces into scholarly discourse the interdisciplinary concept of the ‘visual Gavagai’, extending Willard Van Orman Quine’s famous thought experiment on the radical indeterminacy of translation into the realm of visual perception and art. The proposed concept allows for transcending the traditional art-historical dichotomy between the search for an immanent authorial intention and the subjective arbitrariness of interpretation, instead affirming the ontological status of indeterminacy as a fundamental property of the artwork itself. By synthesizing the methodological frameworks of Ernst Gombrich (schema and correction), media theory, and receptive aesthetics, and by engaging with the speculative philosophy of Armen Avanessian, the article demonstrates how meaning emerges through a dynamic dialogue between the stable structure of the object and the act of its perception. A detailed analysis of the interpretative polyvalence of Alexander Pushkin’s The Bronze Horseman, as examined by Yuri Borev during his transition from structuralism to receptive aesthetics, reveals that the integrity of an artistic world is constructed externally — within the horizon of expectations of the beholder, who actively ‘mends’ their understanding by integrating new cultural codes. Ultimately, the visual Gavagai proposes a new research optic and an ethics of perception founded on a tolerance for the multiplicity of meanings and a recognition of the artwork’s right to its own agency, irreducible to human comprehension. This opens new perspectives for the analysis of both classical art and contemporary digital media landscapes. 

Keywords: Gavagai, visual philosophy, indeterminacy of translation, interpretation, receptive aesthetics, media theory, philosophy of art, visual perception, meaningmaking, horizon of expectations 


References:

Avanessian A. Metafizika segodnya [Metaphysics Today], transl. from German V. Kotelevskaya. Moscow, V-A-C press Publ., 2019. 108 p. (In Russian)

Borev Yu.B. Iskusstvo interpretatsii i otsenki: Opyt prochteniya “Mednogo vsadnika” [The Art of Interpretation and Evaluation: An Experience of Reading The Bronze Horseman]. Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1981. 400 p. (In Russian)

Graham S., Thrift N. Neispravnost’: remontirovat’, podderzhivat’ rabotu i ponimat’ [Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance], transl. from English A.V. Markov, A.A. Arustamova. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2014, no. 2, pp. 147–174. (In Russian)

Gusarova K.O. Mezhdu istinoi i nelepost’yu: fotografii zhivotnykh v kontekste taksidermicheskikh praktik rubezha XIX–XX vv. [Between Truth and Absurdity: Animal Photography in the Context of Taxidermic Practices at the Turn of the 20th Century]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Literaturovedenie. Yazykoznanie. Kul’turologiya, 2025, no. 4, pp. 105–124. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-4-105-124. (In Russian)

Zagidullina M.V. Kontekst i mediaehstetika: vozmozhnosti razvitiya algoritmov diskurs-analiza [Context and Media Aesthetics: Opportunities for the Development of Discourse Analysis Algorithms]. Voprosy zhurnalistiki, pedagogiki, yazykoznaniya, 2022, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 621–627. (In Russian)

Sohn-Rethel A. Ideal’nye polomki [Ideal Breakdowns], transl. from German A.Ya. Yarin. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Gründrisse Publ., 2016. 108 p. (In Russian)

Kittler F. Opticheskie media: Berlinskie lektsii 1999 g. [Optical Media: Berlin Lectures 1999], transl. from German O. Nikiforov, B. Skuratov, A. Markov. Moscow, Logos Publ., Gnozis Publ., 2009. 272 p. (In Russian)

Kozhanova V.Yu. Kontsepty retseptivnoi ehstetiki v interpretativnoi paradigme mediateksta [Concepts of Receptive Aesthetics in the Interpretive Paradigm of Media Text]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10: Zhurnalistika, 2012, no. 5, pp. 97–107. (In Russian)

Quine W.V.O. Slovo i ob’ekt [Word and Object], transl. from English A.Z. Chernyak, T.A. Dmitriev. Moscow, Logos Publ., Praksis Publ., 2000. 386 p. (In Russian)

McLuhan H.M. Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man], transl. from English V. Nikolaev, concl. article M. Vavilov. Moscow, Zhukovsky, KANON-press-TS Publ., Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2003. 464 p. (In Russian)

Mikhailova M.V. Klassicheskii tekst kak lichnoe bytie [Classical Text as Personal Being]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, 2011, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 257–271. (In Russian)

Savchuk V.V. Mediafilosofiya: Pristup real’nosti [Media Philosophy: The Attack of Reality]. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo RKHGA Publ., 2013. 350 p. (In Russian)

Turysheva O.N. Teoriya i metodologiya zarubezhnogo literaturovedeniya [Theory and Methodology of Foreign Literary Studies]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ., 2012. 160 p. (In Russian)

Ernst W. Logos mashiny i ego granitsy s ponyatiem media [The Logos of the Machine and Its Borders with the Concept of Media], transl. from German B. Skuratov. Logos, 2010, no. 1 (74), pp. 193–206. (In Russian)

Yakovleva L.Yu. Arkhitektura kak interfeis: svyaz’, razryv, polomka [Architecture as Interface: Connection, Disruption, Breakdown]. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 2025, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 236–252. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v7i2.653. (In Russian)

Avanessian A. Cubist Unions: Robert Musil’s Novella The Perfecting of a Love. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 2013, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00168890.2013.756780.

Avanessian A. Irony and the Logic of Modernity. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2015. 229 p.

Gombrich E.H. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation: The A.W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts, 1956, National Gallery of Art, Washington. [New York], Pantheon Books, [1960]. 466 p.

Gombrich E.H. The Use of Art for the Study of Symbols. American Psychologist, 1965, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021883.

Gombrich E.H. Review Lecture, Mirror and Map: Theories of Pictorial Representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1975, vol. 270, no. 903, pp. 119–149.



Received 28.09.2025 

Revised 15.01.2026 

Accepted 19.01.2026 



Скачать в pdf