2025 № 4 (55)
The Motif of ‘Cinema about Cinema’ in Russian Feature Films of the Second Half of the 1920s
UDC 791.43/.45
BBC 85.373(2)
DOI: 10.51678/2226-0072-2025-4-696-723
For cit.: Vlaskin K.A. The Motif of ‘Cinema about Cinema’ in Russian Feature Films of the Second Half of the 1920s. Hudozhestvennaya kul’tura [Art & Culture Studies], 2025, no. 4, pp. 696-723. https://doi.org/10.51678/2226-0072-2025-4-696-723 (In Russian)
Vlaskin Kirill A.
PhD Student, Western Contemporary Art Department, State Institute for Art Studies, 5 Kozitsky Lane, Moscow, 125375, Russia
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9943-8716
ResearcherID: OHR-7569-2025
The Motif of ‘Cinema about Cinema’ in Russian Feature Films of the Second Half of the 1920s
Abstract. The article is devoted to the phenomenon that has become quite widespread in the world cinema — films reflecting on the nature of cinema, or ‘cinema about cinema’. The motif of ‘cinema about cinema’ emerged in the early years of cinematography and was often applied in order to add comedy to films. However, even a simple joke, a cinematic gag can become a starting point for reflections on what cinematography is. Through the doubling of artistic reality, filmmakers give rise to discussions about various aspects of cinema: artistic, production, and sociological. Cinema itself reflects on its own nature and is involved in heated discussions between its theorists and practitioners.
The article analyses several Soviet feature films of the 1920s which feature the motif of ‘cinema about cinema’. The postrevolutionary 1920s became a special transition period for the Russian film industry and cinematography, when cinema, after the Civil War and the emigration of leading film industrialists, was trying to revive in the new conditions of state control. Young filmmakers who stood at the forefront of cinematography through their unusual theories and experimental practice defined the new look of cinema. However, not only manifestos proclaimed the new cinematic aesthetics. Films such as The Cigarette Girl from Mosselprom (1924), A Kiss from Mary Pickford (1927), and Blown-up Days (1930), where the theme of making and showing films is central, reflect different trends and views on cinema as art, entertainment, and a way of political propaganda.
Keywords: Soviet cinema, metacinema, cinema about cinema, moviegoer, filmmaking, comedy, Igor Ilyinsky, Yuri Zhelyabuzhsky
Sources:
Delo khudozhestvennogo filma “Kinokar’era zvonorya” [Film File of the Film The Bell Ringer’s Film Career]. Bumazhnyi arkhiv GFF [Paper Archive of Gosfilmofond of Russia], f. 400, ll. 23–25. (In Russian)
References:
Bagrov P.A. Protazanov i stanovlenie vyisokoi komedii v russkom kino [Protazanov and the Formation of High Comedy in Russian Cinema]. Kinovedcheskie zapiski, 2008, no. 88., pp. 215–232. (In Russian)
Bakhtin M.M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura Srednevekovya i Renessansa [The Work of Francois Rabelais and the Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2021. 640 p. (In Russian)
Vertov D. Iz naslediya [From the Heritage]. Vol. 2: Stat’i i vyistupleniya [Articles and Speeches], comp., text. prep., preface L.V. Kruzhkov. Moscow, Eizenshtein-tsentr Publ., 2008. 648 p. (In Russian)
Deleuze G. Kino [Cinema], transl. from French B. Skuratov. 2nd ed. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., Muzei sovremennogo iskusstva “Garazh” Publ., 2020. 560 p. (In Russian)
Zorkaya N.M. Istoriya sovetskogo kino [The History of Soviet Cinema]. St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2005. 544 p. (In Russian)
Kushnirovich M. Moda v strane geroev [Fashion in the Land of Heroes]. Seans, 1995, no. 11, pp. 133–141. (In Russian)
Lotman Yu.M. Semiotika kino i problemyi kinoehstetiki [Semiotics of Cinema and Problems of Film Aesthetics]. Tallinn, Eesti raamat Publ., 1973. 135 p. (In Russian)
Margolit E. Zhivyie i mertvoe. Zametki k istorii sovetskogo kino 1920–1960-kh godov [The Living and the Dead. Notes on the History of Soviet Cinema in the 1920s and 1960s.]. St. Petersburg, Masterskaya “Seans” Publ., 2012. 560 p. (In Russian)
Margolit E.Ya. V ozhidanii otveta. Otechestvennoe kino: filmy i ikh lyudi [Waiting for an Answer. Russian Cinema: Films and Their People]. Мoscow, Rosebud Publishing Publ., 2019. 464 p.
Medvedev A. Soslagatel’noe naklonenie. Besedy po istorii otechestvennogo kino [Subjunctive Mood. Conversations on the History of Russian Cinema]. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Dedinskogo / Kinovedcheskaya artel’ 1895.io Publ., 2023. 592 p. (In Russian)
Potselui Meri [Mary’s Kiss]. Vechernyaya Moskva, 1927, September 17, p. 12. (In Russian)
Troshin A.S. Vremya ostanavlivaetsya. Kino — teatr — televidenie — zhizn’: Stat’i i zametki raznykih let [Time Stops. Cinema — Theater — Television — Life: Articles and Notes from Different Years]. Moscow, Eizenshtein-tsentr Publ., Muzei kino Publ., Nauchno-issledovatelskii institut kinoiskusstva Publ., 2002. 471 p. (In Russian)
Khrenov N.A. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya iskusstva: perekhodnaya ehpokha [The Social Psychology of Art: The Transitional Era]. Moscow, Al’fa-M Publ., 2005. 624 p. (In Russian)
Elsesser T., Hagener M. Teoriya kino. Glaz, emotsii, telo [Theory of Cinema. The Eye, the Emotions, the Body]. St. Petersburg, Seans Publ., 2021. 440 p. (In Russian)
Bernstein J.M. Fight Club: Enlivenment, Love, and the Aesthetics of Violence in the Age of Trump. Metacinema: The Form and Content of Filmic Reference and Reflexivity, ed. D. LaRocca. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 191–218.
Landy J. 8½: Self-Reflexive Fiction and Mental Training. Metacinema: The Form and Content of Filmic Reference and Reflexivity, ed. D. LaRocca. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 139–154.
Palis E. Méliès, Astruc, and Scorsese: Authorship, Historiography, and Videographic Styles. Metacinema: The Form and Content of Filmic Reference and Reflexivity, ed. D. LaRocca. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 115–136.
Pippin R.B. Cinematic Self-Consciousness in Hitchcock’s Rear Window. Metacinema: The Form and Content of Filmic Reference and Reflexivity, ed. D. LaRocca. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 31–52.
Schofield P. Funny Games: Film, Imagination, and Moral Complicity. Metacinema: The Form and Content of Filmic Reference and Reflexivity, ed. by D. LaRocca. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 219–232.
Received 05.03.2025
Accepted 11.06.2025