2025 № 3 (54)
Documentary Effect in Cinema
UDC 7.01
BBC 85.375
DOI: 10.51678/2226-0072-2025-3-508-533
For cit.: Zhukov D.K. Documentary Effect in Cinema. Hudozhestvennaya kul’tura [Art & Culture Studies], 2025, no. 3, pp. 508–533. https://doi.org/10.51678/2226-0072-2025-3-508-533. (In Russian)
Zhukov Dmitry K.
Specialist, PhD Student, Department of Social Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of Literature and Creative Writing, 25 Tverskoy Boulevard, Moscow, 123104, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-0779
Documentary Effect in Cinema
Abstract. The article explores the phenomenon of the ‘documentary effect’ in cinema and its impact on the viewer’s perception. It considers various philosophical approaches to understanding documentary films, including the theories by G. Currie, N. Carroll, and C. Plantinga. Critically analysing these concepts, the author proposes his own understanding of the documentary effect based on the idea of interrupting aesthetic perception. Two types of the documentary effect are identified: ‘filming of reality’ and ‘the reality of filming’. The first type is associated with the viewer’s emotional response to shocking or ‘practically’ significant events, while the second one relates to unintentional elements in the filming process. It is argued that the documentary effect occurs when the continuity of the narrative is disrupted, which makes the viewer think about the reality of what is happening on the screen. This leads to a specific phenomenal experience balancing between engagement in viewing and critical evaluation of the film as a work of art. The article contributes to the ongoing discussion about the nature of documentary cinema and its relationship to fictional films, offering a nuanced perspective on how viewers interact with and interpret documentary content.
Keywords: philosophy of art, documentary film, aesthetic disinterest, aesthetic experience, artistic device, ‘documentary effect’
References:
Bullough E. “Psikhicheskaya distantsiya” kak faktor v iskusstve i kak ehsteticheskii printsip [“Psychical Distance” as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle]. Sovremennaya kniga po ehstetike: Antologiya [Modern Book on Aesthetics: Anthology], transl. from English E.N. Glagoleva et al., ed., intr. article A. Egorov. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo inostrannoi literatury Publ., 1957, pp. 151–175. (In Russian)
Kant I. Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh [Essays in German and Russian]. Vol. 4: Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya [Critique of the Faculty of Judgment; The First Introduction to the Critique of the Faculty of Judgment]. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 2001. 1120 p. (In Russian)
Hume D. O tragedii [About Tragedy], transl. F.F. Vermel. Hutcheson F., Hume D., Smith A. Ehstetika [Aesthetics]. Мoscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1973, pp. 351–361. (Istoriya ehstetiki v pamyatnikakh i dokumentakh [The History of Aesthetics in Monuments and Documents]). (In Russian)
Carroll N. Fiction, Non-Fiction, and the Film of Presumptive Assertion: A Conceptual Analysis. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures: An Anthology, eds. N. Carroll and J. Choi. Malden, Blackwell Publishing, 2006, pp. 154–171.
Carroll N. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007. 256 p.
Currie G. Film, Reality, and Illusion. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, eds. D. Bordwell, N. Carroll. University of Wisconsin Press, 1996, pp. 325–344.
Currie G. Documentary Traces. Film and the Content of Photographs. The Philosophy of Documentary Film: Image, Sound, Fiction, Truth, ed. D. LaRocca. London, Lexington Books, 2017, pp. 95–112.
Feagin S. The Pleasures of Tragedy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1983, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 95–104.
Friend S. The Pleasures of Documentary Tragedy. British Journal of Aesthetics, 2007, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayl055.
Friend S. Falsehoods in Film: Documentary vs Fiction. Studies in Documentary Film, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 151–162.
Gendler Т. The Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance. The Journal of Philosophy, 2000, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 55–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678446.
Moura V. Show and Tell: The Identification of Documentary Film. The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, eds. N. Carroll, L.T. Di Summa, S. Loht. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 603–626.
Plantinga C. What a Documentary Is, After All. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 2005, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00188.x.
Plantinga C. Documentary. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, eds. P. Livingstone, C. Plantinga. New York, Routledge, 2008, pp. 494–504.
Ponech T. What Is Non-Fiction Cinema? Film Theory and Philosophy, eds. R. Allen, M. Smith. New York, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 203–220.
Sobchack V. Inscribing Ethical Space: Ten Propositions on Death, Representation, and Documentary. The Philosophy of Documentary Film: Image, Sound, Fiction, Truth, ed. D. LaRocca. London, Lexington Books, 2017, pp. 125–156.
Stolnitz J. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Criticism: A Critical Introduction. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1960. 510 p.
Terrone E. Documentaries, Docudramas, and Perceptual Beliefs. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 2020, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12703.
Received 03.09.2024
Accepted 12.01.2025
